20 February 2017 · Lukáš Steiniger

The Register of Public Sector Partners and a new obligation for businesses

The Register of Public Sector Partners and a new obligation for businesses
Legal status as of the publication date (20 February 2017). Later legislative changes may not be reflected in the text.

On 1 February 2017, Act No. 315/2016 Coll. on the Register of Public Sector Partners (hereinafter the "Act") entered into force.  Under the Act, every legal or natural person that enters into a legal relationship with the state, receives funds, acquires assets or other property values from the state, or (rather) supplies services or resources to the state or state authorities must register in the Register of Public Sector Partners (hereinafter the "RPVS"). The Act also applies to the subcontractors of those persons who are public sector partners. Subcontractors, too, are public sector partners and are obliged to register in the register through authorised persons and to keep these entries up to date. The RPVS replaces the former register of ultimate beneficial owners, which played a significant role in public procurement.

Who is not obliged to register

The Act not only lays down who is obliged to register in the RPVS, but also defines who has no such obligation. The following are not obliged to register:

  • Low-value dealings — partners whose business dealings with the state do not exceed EUR 100,000, or EUR 250,000 in aggregate where several transactions are involved.
  • Low-value assets acquired — where the value of the assets acquired from the state does not exceed EUR 100,000.
  • Exempt entities — a non-profit organisation, a bank, or a branch of a foreign bank.

The essence of the Register of Public Sector Partners

The Register of Public Sector Partners is a public register whose purpose is, in particular, to reveal the ownership structure of companies that will do, or already do, business with the state (hereinafter a "public sector partner") and thus to identify the ultimate beneficial owner, as well as to reveal in which companies public officials are involved.

Key point

The RPVS is a public register that makes transparent the ownership structure and the ultimate beneficial owner of every company that does business with the state. Registration can be carried out only through an authorised person.

Who is the ultimate beneficial owner?

Pursuant to § 6a par. 1 letter a) of Act No. 297/2008 Coll. on protection against the legalisation of proceeds of crime and on protection against the financing of terrorism, the ultimate beneficial owner is defined as follows:

Sample clause

"The ultimate beneficial owner is any natural person who actually controls or exercises control over a legal person, a natural person – entrepreneur or an association of assets, and any natural person for whose benefit those entities carry out their activity or business."

In particular, in the case of a legal person that is neither an association of assets nor an issuer of securities admitted to trading on a regulated market subject to disclosure requirements, the ultimate beneficial owner includes a natural person who:

  • Holds at least 25 % — a direct or indirect interest, or the sum thereof, of at least 25 % of the voting rights in the legal person or of its registered capital, including bearer shares.
  • Can appoint or remove governing bodies — has the right to appoint, otherwise install or remove the statutory, managing, supervisory or control body, or any member thereof.
  • Controls by other means — controls the legal person by a means other than those set out in the first two points.
  • Has the right to a 25 % economic benefit — has the right to an economic benefit of at least 25 % of the legal person's business or of its other activity.

How to process registration in the Register of Public Sector Partners?

Registration may be carried out only by an authorised person, for example an attorney, an auditor or a tax adviser, who is obliged to reliably identify the ultimate beneficial owner and to carry out the registration in the RPVS. Anyone who therefore wishes to "do business with the state" will have to have a contract concluded for registration in the RPVS, e.g. with an attorney. The authorised person is responsible for identifying the ultimate beneficial owner not only upon the first entry in the register, but also for its subsequent verification at the intervals and deadlines laid down by law. At the same time, the Act expressly states that the authorised person's conduct in the registration must meet the requirements of conduct with professional care.

The operator of the RPVS is the Ministry of Justice of the Slovak Republic, while the registration is carried out by the District Court Žilina. Registration takes place exclusively electronically.

The following data are entered in the RPVS: data on the person who is to be a partner, data on the ultimate beneficial owner and, where a public official is also a member of the ownership structure, data on the public official as well. The RPVS carries out, or (rather) refuses, the entry of a partner within 5 working days of the filing of the application. Objections may be lodged against a refusal to carry out the entry. Exceptionally, an entry in the RPVS is not subject to court fees.

The sanction mechanism

Responsibility for the accuracy of the data set out in the RPVS lies not only with the public sector partner, but also with the authorised person. Where false or incomplete information is provided, not only about the public sector partner and the ultimate beneficial owner, but also about public officials, the registering authority is entitled to impose a fine of EUR 10,000 to EUR 1,000,000, taking into account in particular the nature, seriousness, manner and consequences of the breach of obligations. If the fine is not paid, the registry court will delete the public sector partner from the RPVS and, at the same time, the statutory body of the public sector partner will be excluded, for a period of 3 years from the date on which the decision becomes final, from the office of member of the statutory or supervisory body of all companies in which it is involved, or (rather) will not be able to hold these offices at all during such a period. A consequence of the deletion of a public sector partner from the RPVS is also the state's right to withdraw from the contract, or (rather) the option not to perform the contract, whereby the state, as a contracting party, will not fall into default.

Important

Providing false or incomplete information exposes both the public sector partner and the authorised person to a fine of EUR 10,000 to EUR 1,000,000. Non-payment leads to deletion from the RPVS, a 3-year ban on the statutory body holding office in companies, and the state's right to withdraw from the contract.

The question arises here as to what happens if a situation occurs in which a public sector partner is deleted from the RPVS but, after the appointment of a new statutory body and payment of the sanction, wishes to be re-entered in the RPVS. The Act does not regulate the situation of re-entry, from which it could follow that, once the shortcomings have been remedied and the ultimate beneficial owner identified, such a company should be re-entered in the RPVS. On the other hand, there is a view as to whether the legislator did not intend deletion from the RPVS to be understood as an absolute sanction and thus to bar from participation in public contracts even those entities that will not fulfil, or (rather) did not fulfil, their statutory obligations. However, we find no answer to this issue even in the explanatory memorandum to the Act, and so it is up to the legislator, in the interest of clarity of the legislation, to define its intentions in this respect.

Since the RPVS replaces the register of ultimate beneficial owners, entities registered in that register are indeed regarded as public sector partners; however, they are obliged to carry out verification of the ultimate beneficial owner and to bring the entry in the RPVS into line through an authorised person by 31 July 2017.

i

The obligations of a public sector partner do not end with its entry in the RPVS: the authorised person (e.g. an attorney) must verify the ultimate beneficial owner at least once a year, always as at 31 December.

Mgr. Lukáš Steiniger

About the author

Mgr. Lukáš Steiniger

Partner

Co-founder of STEINIGER | law firm and an expert in tax, international taxation and accounting. He specialises in the regulation and taxation of crypto-assets and in structuring crypto businesses in Slovakia and abroad — advising crypto projects and educating companies and individuals.

lukas.steiniger@steinigers.com

Frequently asked questions

Who must register in the Register of Public Sector Partners?

Every legal or natural person that enters into a legal relationship with the state, receives funds or assets from the state, or supplies services or resources to the state or state authorities — and the subcontractors of such persons.

Who is not obliged to register?

Partners whose dealings with the state do not exceed EUR 100,000 (or EUR 250,000 in aggregate), those whose assets acquired from the state do not exceed EUR 100,000, and non-profit organisations, banks and branches of foreign banks.

Who is the ultimate beneficial owner?

Any natural person who actually controls a legal person or for whose benefit it operates — in particular a person holding at least 25 % of the voting rights or registered capital, able to appoint or remove the governing bodies, controlling by other means, or entitled to at least 25 % of the economic benefit.

Who can carry out the registration?

Only an authorised person, such as an attorney, an auditor or a tax adviser, who reliably identifies the ultimate beneficial owner, carries out the entry and verifies it at the statutory intervals with professional care.

What are the sanctions for false or incomplete data?

A fine of EUR 10,000 to EUR 1,000,000. Non-payment leads to deletion from the RPVS, a 3-year ban on the statutory body holding office in companies, and the state's right to withdraw from the contract.

How often must the ultimate beneficial owner be verified?

At least once a year, always as at 31 December, carried out through the authorised person.